According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on March 12, 2025, was US$13.3 million. Notably, ARKB saw a significant inflow of US$82.6 million, while IBIT experienced a substantial outflow of US$47.1 million. Other ETFs like BTCO and GBTC also saw outflows of US$12.4 million and US$11.8 million, respectively. BTC, however, had a minor inflow of US$5.5 million. This data suggests a mixed sentiment among investors, with a slight overall positive flow towards Bitcoin ETFs.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-12 was -10.3 million USD, indicating a net outflow. Significant outflows were observed in FETH (-3.7 million USD), CETH (-1.7 million USD), EZET (-1.4 million USD), and ETH (-3.5 million USD), while ETHA, ETHW, ETHV, QETH, and ETHE showed no change in flow.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow of Bitcoin ETFs on March 11, 2025, was -371 million USD, indicating significant outflows across various ETFs. Notably, IBIT and FBTC experienced the largest outflows of -151.3 million USD and -107.1 million USD, respectively. This data suggests a potential shift in investor sentiment towards Bitcoin ETFs.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-11 was -21.6 million USD, with ETHA and FETH experiencing outflows of -11.8 million USD and -9.8 million USD respectively. Other Ethereum-related ETFs, including ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, ETHE, and ETH, showed no net flow. This data suggests a bearish sentiment among investors towards Ethereum ETFs on this date.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-10 was -34 million USD, indicating a significant outflow. The largest outflows were observed in FETH (-23.7 million USD), ETHE (-4.8 million USD), and ETH (-3.9 million USD), with ETHW also showing a minor outflow of -1.6 million USD. Other ETFs like ETHA, ETHV, QETH, and EZET reported no flow. This data suggests a bearish sentiment among investors towards Ethereum ETFs on this date.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow of Bitcoin ETFs on 2025-03-07 was -409.3 million USD, indicating significant outflows. Major contributors to this trend were FBTC with -154.9 million USD, ARKB with -160 million USD, and IBIT with -39.9 million USD. GBTC also saw outflows of -36.5 million USD, while HODL was the only ETF with a positive flow of 0.6 million USD. This data suggests a bearish sentiment among investors towards Bitcoin ETFs on this date.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-07 was -23.1 million USD, with ETHA and FETH experiencing outflows of -11.2 million USD and -11.9 million USD respectively. Other Ethereum ETFs such as ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, ETHE, and ETH showed no flow activity.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-06 was -10 million USD, with ETHA contributing the entire outflow. Other ETFs, including FETH, ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, ETHE, and ETH, showed no net flow. This data suggests a cautious or bearish sentiment among investors towards Ethereum ETFs, specifically ETHA, on this date.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on March 5, 2025, was US$22.1 million. Notably, IBIT led with a positive flow of US$38.9 million, while BITB and BTCO experienced outflows of US$6.9 million and US$9.9 million, respectively. Other ETFs, including FBTC, ARKB, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, GBTC, and BTC, showed no flow activity.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-05 was -63.3 million US dollars, with ETHE being the only ETF showing a negative flow of -63.3 million US dollars. All other Ethereum ETFs, including ETHA, FETH, ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, and ETH, reported zero net flow.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on March 4, 2025, was $14.6 million. Notably, FETH saw a significant positive inflow of $21.7 million, whereas ETHA experienced a substantial outflow of $26.3 million. ETHE and ETH also had positive net flows of $10.7 million and $8.5 million respectively. This data suggests a varied investor interest across different Ethereum ETFs, which could impact trading strategies and portfolio adjustments.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on February 28, 2025, was $94.3 million. Notably, ARKB saw significant inflows of $193.7 million, while IBIT experienced outflows amounting to -$244.6 million, which may indicate a shift in investor sentiment. The FBTC ETF had substantial inflows of $176 million, potentially signaling increased investor confidence in this asset. Conversely, GBTC saw outflows of -$33.3 million, suggesting a potential decline in its attractiveness to investors. These movements highlight varying investor preferences across different Bitcoin ETFs. (Source: Farside Investors)

According to Farside Investors, the Ethereum ETF market experienced a total net outflow of $41.9 million on February 28, 2025. The largest outflow was from ETHA, with a withdrawal of $30.2 million. Additionally, ETHE saw a significant outflow of $11.7 million. Other ETFs such as FETH, ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, and EZET reported no net flow changes. This data indicates potential bearish sentiment among investors concerning Ethereum ETFs.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow of Bitcoin ETFs on February 21, 2025, was -62.9 million USD. Notable changes include an inflow of 21.6 million USD for IBIT and a significant outflow of 60.1 million USD for GBTC, indicating a potential shift in investor confidence or strategy. These movements are crucial for traders to consider as they reflect significant asset reallocations within the Bitcoin ETF market.

According to Farside Investors, the Ethereum ETF market saw a net outflow of $8.9 million as of February 21, 2025, primarily driven by withdrawals from the ETHW fund, which alone accounted for the entire outflow. Other funds such as ETHA, FETH, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, and ETHE showed no net change. This suggests a selective investor pullback specifically from the ETHW fund, impacting the overall net flow in Ethereum ETFs.

According to Farside Investors, on February 19, 2025, the Ethereum ETF market saw a total net inflow of $19 million. Notably, the FETH ETF experienced a significant inflow of $24.5 million, indicating strong investor interest. Conversely, the ETHE ETF had an outflow of $5.5 million, suggesting a reduction in investor positions. This activity highlights a shift in investor preferences within Ethereum ETFs, potentially impacting trading strategies. Source: Farside Investors.

According to Farside Investors, Ethereum ETFs experienced a total net flow of $4.6 million on February 18, 2025, primarily through FETH, which received the entire net inflow, while other ETFs like ETHA, ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, ETHE, and ETH saw no net flow. This indicates a focused investor interest in FETH, potentially impacting its trading volume and price positioning.

According to Lookonchain, on February 18, Bitcoin ETFs experienced a positive net flow of 826 BTC, equivalent to $79.74 million. Notably, Fidelity reported inflows of 961 BTC, valued at $92.78 million, and currently holds 208,503 BTC worth $20.14 billion. Meanwhile, Ethereum ETFs saw a net flow of 4,249 ETH, amounting to $11.56 million, with Fidelity receiving all 4,249 ETH, increasing its holdings to 456,903 ETH, valued at $1.24 billion.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on February 14, 2025, was positive at $70.6 million. The most significant inflows were seen in FBTC with $94 million and IBIT with $22.3 million. However, there were notable outflows from ARKB at -$13.2 million and GBTC at -$47 million. This suggests a mixed market sentiment, with some investors reallocating their portfolios. The positive net flow overall indicates a bullish outlook for Bitcoin ETFs.

According to Farside Investors, the net flow into Ethereum ETFs on February 14, 2025, totaled $11.7 million, with all inflows attributed to the FETH ETF. This indicates a strong market interest in FETH, potentially impacting Ethereum's market dynamics and providing traders with insights into investor sentiment specific to this ETF. No flows were recorded for other Ethereum ETFs such as ETHA, ETHW, or ETHE, highlighting FETH's dominance in this period.